Lecture Series on Software Engineering by Prof.N.L. Sarda, Prof. Umesh Bellur,Prof.R.K.Joshi and Prof.Shashi Kelkar, Department of Computer Science & Engineering ,IIT Bombay . For more details on NPTEL visit http://nptel.iitm.ac.in
Duration : 0:52:21
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
use Nero vision…. …
use Nero vision….its come with nero cd write package which also include movie make!
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
New versions of …
New versions of Real Player allow you to download multimedia content from a webpage, another one is “YouTube Downloader” just do a google search
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
beta edition or …
beta edition or which one?! XD
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
yo mamma
yo mamma
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
the waterfall model …
the waterfall model works fine, as long as you iterate back to previous phases when necessary.
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
It’s a berry berry …
It’s a berry berry funny joke.
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
may i know what …
may i know what software was used in making this video?
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
why?
why?
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
orbit dowloader. …
orbit dowloader. Google it
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
how can i download …
how can i download this video
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
is this is a joke
is this is a joke
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
First of all …
First of all congratulations to Prof.N.L. Sarda for shaping up such a good video presentation on S/W engineering. Few comments though:
In my experience, S/w engineering principles have changed quite significantly over the last decade or so. New models such as Agile methods takes software engineering in a very different way.
The waterfall model is argued by many to be a bad idea in practice because it is nearly impossible to get one phase perfected before moving on to the next phases.
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
(6) My experience …
(6) My experience is that many companies state they follow the Waterfall Model, but when you look into the projects, you discover that managers and developers skew that model into some form of an iterative method, which is often down without any documentation. I dont know anyone who follows the Waterfall Method as it was originally intended! Again, nice introduction to the topic!
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
(4) Prediction is …
(4) Prediction is not binary. Qualitative prediction has to do with what you mean by actual values being CLOSE TO expected values. I can predict I will be close to expected results but it may not be statistically based. (5) Process models (process descriptions) should explicitly identify forms of feedback that are the basis for improvement and evolution.
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
(3) A process is …
(3) A process is simply something that is done to produce some output. You do not have to have objectives, exit criteria, or documented steps to have a process. When a trained engineer follows a documented process description, which states inputs, outputs, entry and exit criteria, etc. then there is process maturity. Objectives defined should be measured at the conclusion of the process and should be the basis for improvement. A defect is something that is a variant between objective and result.
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
A nice video. Some …
A nice video. Some comments. (1) I believe a process should encompass all aspects of PDCA cycle, so a process should integrate both the planning and improvement actions as well as the Doing.” (2) A process is not the same as a methodology, which you are describing. No matter if I am using a waterfall, spiral, iterative or rapid development method, I can use the same design process. A methodology only restricts when in my lifecycle I can perform which processes; e.g., no Design in Reqts Analysis
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
very helpful
very helpful
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Funny stuff! I …
Funny stuff! I loved it.
June 21st, 2009 at 4:26 pm
thank you for your …
thank you for your help